When a party files a lawsuit there are many things he or she must prove besides just the facts of the case. One of these legal concepts is known in Latin as “locus standi,” in other words, “standing to sue.” Here is the essential breakdown of the standing to sue definition and how it might affect your legal rights.
What Are the Three Elements of Standing to Sue?
Standing to sue is comprised of three elements that must be present for a lawsuit to be valid. When you define standing to sue, in the legal world, “element” is another word for a factor that the party must prove as part of a broader legal concept. In terms of standing, a party must prove the following three elements.
Injury in Fact
Injury in fact means that a person has suffered an actual injury. This can be a physical injury or economic loss. However, this element can also include harm that is caused to conservation, aesthetic, or recreational interests. Importantly, in most cases, the injury must already have occurred, rather than being something hypothetical that might happen in the future.
Causation means that the injury to the plaintiff was caused by the party that is being sued. In other words, the party bringing the lawsuit needs to show that “but for” the defendant’s action or inaction, they would not have been injured. If you cannot prove a connection between the defendant’s conduct and the injury, you will not be able to prove standing to bring the lawsuit.
Finally, redressability in standing to sue means that the court will actually be capable of doing something to correct or make up for the plaintiff’s injury. This can mean ordering the defendant to undo what it has done, or if that isn’t possible, imposing penalties or fines that would have a deterrent effect.
It’s important to remember that the court’s jurisdiction does not extend outside of the United States, and courts can only order parties to take certain actions. That means there is a limit on whether a court’s order can “redress” the injury the plaintiff has suffered.
When interpreting these standards in standing to sue, courts have also added other rules, often called “prudential standing,” to help them consistently apply standing law. These rules include limits on when taxpayers can sue for grievances that affect the general public, and the requirement that the injury be within the “zone of interest” a statute is intended to cover, among many others.
For a free legal consultation, call 800-537-8185
What Does Standing to Sue Mean?
In layman’s terms, legal standing to sue is about who has the right to bring an action in court, not about the facts of the actual case. Under Article III of the Constitution, courts can only hear actual “cases” or “controversies,” so standing law helps enforce this requirement by requiring that the plaintiff’s injury can actually be addressed by the court.
It’s important to note that because standing law is established by the US Constitution, these requirements only apply to federal court lawsuits. For state standing to sue requirements, you would look to state law. An attorney at Morris Bart can explain the laws in your state.
Why Is Standing to Sue Determined By?
At the most basic level, courts require standing because the Constitution requires them to enforce the law. However there are many policy reasons that courts require legal standing.
Because of the requirement that federal courts only hear actual “cases or controversies,” these requirements prevent courts from litigating abstract political questions that have public significance, but have not actually yet harmed anyone. This means that courts can use their time and efforts only on those cases where they can have an actual impact.
Who Has Standing to Sue?
Any plaintiff who can demonstrate through evidence that they have suffered an injury or illness that has caused them harm has standing to sue in court. This could be the victim of an injury, the surviving loved ones of the victim of a fatal injury, or in some cases the parents of a child who was injured.
Keep in mind that not every injury is legally recognized in a court of law. For example, almost being hurt in a wreck doesn’t count in the eyes of the law, so there is no legal remedy available. When an injury is recognized by our courts, it is known as an “injury in fact.”
Complete a Free Case Evaluation form now
Standing to Sue and Data Breaches
Standing to sue can be a difficult concept to prove, especially in cases dealing with identity theft or environmental harm. More recently, people who have had their personal information exposed through a data breach have run into standing problems when they are not able to show that they have been injured yet, but there is the possibility of “future injury” if their data is misused down the road.
Standing to Sue and Environmental Lawsuits
Similarly, parties seeking to bring environmental lawsuits may have trouble proving that the defendant’s conduct caused the harm, especially on more controversial topics such as global warming.
There is also the requirement that the party suing actually be the party who was harmed, because courts will not allow “third party standing,” which is suing on someone else’s behalf, unless that person has legally assigned their right to sue or in other limited circumstances.
Standing to sue is a complex legal topic that has many nuances. If you have questions about legal standing or the required elements, it’s best to contact an attorney who is experienced in that area.
to find a Morris Bart office near you.